biomes don't match up

[Quasarrgames]

I dont really like the fact that the new world generation thing makes worlds that look VERY different from the actual planet. I would suggest either changing the look of the planet, or changing the world generator to have way more arid shrubland and desert and way less forests and oceans.

Just whenever anyone has time

[HatesYourFace]

I dont really like the fact that the new world generation thing makes worlds that look VERY different from the actual planet. I would suggest either changing the look of the planet, or changing the world generator to have way more arid shrubland and desert and way less forests and oceans.

In what way don't they match up? Pick a forest...you get a forest. Pick a square near water and you get water on your map. I'm not sure what your complaint is really?

Are you saying that the generated worlds don't look like the image of the planet in the background on the start screen? When you generate a planet it has it's own name and everything, it isn't supposed to be "THE" planet from that image. That's just art of an example planet.

Just whenever anyone has time

Lol...I'm sure someone's going to jump right on it...

[StorymasterQ]

To get a good planet, you have to..."plan it". BA DUM TSS!

...Sorry.

[Coenmcj]

To get a good planet, you have to..."plan it". BA DUM TSS!

...Sorry.

That was so bad you should be punished.

[bobucles]

How much of a planet area does a map location take? It only shows the pixel you click on.

[theapolaustic1]

Guys, I'm sorry for making you feel dumb, but OP wasn't talking about the biomes you load into not matching the map you choose a landing site on.

He was talking about the main menu image of your ship exploding over a planet that has next to nothing green on it.

[HatesYourFace]

Guys, I'm sorry for making you feel dumb, but OP wasn't talking about the biomes you load into not matching the map you choose a landing site on.

He was talking about the main menu image of your ship exploding over a planet that has next to nothing green on it.

I dont really like the fact that the new world generation thing makes worlds that look VERY different from the actual planet. I would suggest either changing the look of the planet, or changing the world generator to have way more arid shrubland and desert and way less forests and oceans.

In what way don't they match up? Pick a forest...you get a forest. Pick a square near water and you get water on your map. I'm not sure what your complaint is really?

Are you saying that the generated worlds don't look like the image of the planet in the background on the start screen? When you generate a planet it has it's own name and everything, it isn't supposed to be "THE" planet from that image. That's just art of an example planet.

You're right man, I feel so dumb! How could I have missed that? It makes my whole post irrelevant! Lol... Seriously though, every time you make a planet...it's a DIFFERENT planet, your not generating the same world over and over. The dusty, arid planet pictured in the image is just ONE of the many possible worlds you could end up crash landing on. Are you guys seriously implying we should balance the game design around a single piece of random art? The planet is friggin' brown cause the artist wanted it to be brown! It doesn't mean anything! I promise!

[theapolaustic1]

Guys, I'm sorry for making you feel dumb, but OP wasn't talking about the biomes you load into not matching the map you choose a landing site on.

He was talking about the main menu image of your ship exploding over a planet that has next to nothing green on it.

I dont really like the fact that the new world generation thing makes worlds that look VERY different from the actual planet. I would suggest either changing the look of the planet, or changing the world generator to have way more arid shrubland and desert and way less forests and oceans.

In what way don't they match up? Pick a forest...you get a forest. Pick a square near water and you get water on your map. I'm not sure what your complaint is really?

Are you saying that the generated worlds don't look like the image of the planet in the background on the start screen? When you generate a planet it has it's own name and everything, it isn't supposed to be "THE" planet from that image. That's just art of an example planet.

You're right man, I feel so dumb! How could I have missed that? It makes my whole post irrelevant! Lol... Seriously though, every time you make a planet...it's a DIFFERENT planet, your not generating the same world over and over. The dusty, arid planet pictured in the image is just ONE of the many possible worlds you could end up crash landing on. Are you guys seriously implying we should balance the game design around a single piece of random art? The planet is friggin' brown cause the artist wanted it to be brown! It doesn't mean anything! I promise!

Calm your tits. I said "guys". As in "referring to a group, not one individual".

And OP said that he thought there should be new art that showed a more varied biosphere or the game should make more (keyword: not all) of the map generation focus on the aird shrubland biome.

Somebody needs their coffee, lol.

[HatesYourFace]

Guys, I'm sorry for making you feel dumb, but OP wasn't talking about the biomes you load into not matching the map you choose a landing site on.

He was talking about the main menu image of your ship exploding over a planet that has next to nothing green on it.

I dont really like the fact that the new world generation thing makes worlds that look VERY different from the actual planet. I would suggest either changing the look of the planet, or changing the world generator to have way more arid shrubland and desert and way less forests and oceans.

In what way don't they match up? Pick a forest...you get a forest. Pick a square near water and you get water on your map. I'm not sure what your complaint is really?

Are you saying that the generated worlds don't look like the image of the planet in the background on the start screen? When you generate a planet it has it's own name and everything, it isn't supposed to be "THE" planet from that image. That's just art of an example planet.

You're right man, I feel so dumb! How could I have missed that? It makes my whole post irrelevant! Lol... Seriously though, every time you make a planet...it's a DIFFERENT planet, your not generating the same world over and over. The dusty, arid planet pictured in the image is just ONE of the many possible worlds you could end up crash landing on. Are you guys seriously implying we should balance the game design around a single piece of random art? The planet is friggin' brown cause the artist wanted it to be brown! It doesn't mean anything! I promise!

Calm your tits. I said "guys". As in "referring to a group, not one individual".

And OP said that he thought there should be new art that showed a more varied biosphere or the game should make more (keyword: not all) of the map generation focus on the aird shrubland biome.

Somebody needs their coffee, lol.

Lol that was supposed to be exaggerated sarcasm, not maliciousness. Apologies if you were offended! I will add more "Lol's" next time and perhaps a smiley face.