Quote from: Tammabanana on March 04, 2017, 08:04:28 AMNo if you read it was "pederasty more or less can't come up useing that mod." as the in game low is 14 and as the mod used the in-game loven to start the 14y old pawn will need to be married 1st and so the unmoded game can have 14y old's marry and doing it before we the get mod to start working and that's why i say "pederasty more or less can't come up useing that mod."
...so if that mod isn't checking for age, what happens when the min age is modded down to 0, pray tell?
I don't agree with the way in which the mod incompatibility was implemented, but your "but it's not even this mod" defense is flawed*, and so lacking moral high ground. I'm not even going to touch your 14 isn't pederasty/child abuse implication; that speaks volumes on its own.
* (Not just because you're inaccurately presenting it in terms of an unmodded game, but also rhetorically: OK, so which mods should be blocked?)
And my starting comment was on Thirites "I got a tip off from a random anon the mod in question was specifically designed to allow things like detailed pederasty/child sexual abuse etc. with my mod." in that as the mod is only looking for pawns its not "specifically designed" to "allow things like detailed pederasty/child sexual abuse etc. with my mod" its that the modder.
A did not know and mods added in sub 14y old pawns or.
B Did know but was not going to work on adding support for a mod that form what i can see in /vg/ no one at /vg/ is useing /vg/ being the anons hes making the mod for.
A or B are still not that "specifically designed" Thirite saying.