Ludeon Forums

RimWorld => Bugs => Topic started by: Kolljak on April 29, 2016, 08:55:18 AM

Title: Just Noticed Mathmatical Errors
Post by: Kolljak on April 29, 2016, 08:55:18 AM
So im lookin at the age and relationship stuff right... i got a Female who is 65 (780) with a son that has entered that is only 65... no chronological....  how is this possible. also noticed a 32 (45) with a son that is 68 (67) which is weird. there seems to be an Age vs Family Relation mathmatical error or two.
Title: Re: Just Noticed Mathmatical Errors
Post by: blub01 on April 29, 2016, 09:04:45 AM
Quote from: Kolljak on April 29, 2016, 08:55:18 AM
So im lookin at the age and relationship stuff right... i got a Female who is 65 (780) with a son that has entered that is only 65... no chronological....  how is this possible. also noticed a 32 (45) with a son that is 68 (67) which is weird. there seems to be an Age vs Family Relation mathmatical error or two.

first one is definitely possible - female gets out of cryosleep 65 years before present, gets a child, with, say, 30, spends a while raising her son, then gets into cryosleep - possibly on the same ship where her son is a starship janitor (if he's a starter), which would explain the lack of time spent in cryosleep. second one is kind of impossible, though.
Title: Re: Just Noticed Mathmatical Errors
Post by: Kolljak on April 29, 2016, 04:07:22 PM
Mathmaticly its incorrect. she has been in cryo for 700 + years then he child who she had ... lets assume 25.... right

thats 700 - 25  675

this means the child should have ?? (675) as she also would have to have been in cryo to be ALIVE. no one lives for 700 years never aging w/o the chronological clock going up also. see what I'm saying. how can the child be straight 65 when the mother has been in cryo for 700+ years that would mean she would of have to have.... well she could of woken up had the child then went back under. it doesnt finitly say 700 Straight years chronologically.

By the way love your qoute. i agree cosplaying jesus bandits is bad.
Title: Re: Just Noticed Mathmatical Errors
Post by: blub01 on May 08, 2016, 03:07:21 PM
Quote from: Kolljak on April 29, 2016, 04:07:22 PM
Mathmaticly its incorrect. she has been in cryo for 700 + years then he child who she had ... lets assume 25.... right

thats 700 - 25  675

this means the child should have ?? (675) as she also would have to have been in cryo to be ALIVE. no one lives for 700 years never aging w/o the chronological clock going up also. see what I'm saying. how can the child be straight 65 when the mother has been in cryo for 700+ years that would mean she would of have to have.... well she could of woken up had the child then went back under. it doesnt finitly say 700 Straight years chronologically.

By the way love your qoute. i agree cosplaying jesus bandits is bad.

but you don't biologically age in cryosleep, so the mother could have spent a very long time in the icebox BEFORE she got her son.
Title: Re: Just Noticed Mathmatical Errors
Post by: ison on May 26, 2016, 04:33:01 AM
There were some age related bugs in A13. They will be fixed in the next release.