Ludeon Forums

RimWorld => Ideas => Topic started by: starlight on March 20, 2014, 04:44:52 AM

Title: Stacking for meals
Post by: starlight on March 20, 2014, 04:44:52 AM
Meals should stack in groups of more than one.
Otherwise stockpiles quickly fill up only with meals.
Title: Re: Stacking for meals
Post by: Monkfish on March 20, 2014, 09:30:59 AM
Only if something like this is added...

(http://www.advecto.co.uk/media/catalog/product/cache/1/thumbnail/800x/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/B/O/BO-RWRR161_3.jpg)
Title: Re: Stacking for meals
Post by: StorymasterQ on March 20, 2014, 09:14:40 PM
Hm, that could be a buildable furniture, then, like weapon racks, yes?
Title: Re: Stacking for meals
Post by: Monkfish on March 20, 2014, 09:42:30 PM
That would be the idea, yes, covering a 1x1 tile. I think a 10 meal capacity is a nice number, it's low enough that it doesn't just become a bottomless pit for meals, but large enough to be many times more convenient for food storage. A couple of these near the eating areas would likely be more than enough for your averaged sized colony.
Title: Re: Stacking for meals
Post by: starlight on March 21, 2014, 04:51:12 AM
Quote from: Monkfish on March 20, 2014, 09:42:30 PM
That would be the idea, yes, covering a 1x1 tile. I think a 10 meal capacity is a nice number, it's low enough that it doesn't just become a bottomless pit for meals, but large enough to be many times more convenient for food storage. A couple of these near the eating areas would likely be more than enough for your averaged sized colony.

I like the idea. Expandable on request.

While we are at it, what about containers for the rest of the stuff: bins, barrels, pots, bags, and the lot.

Would like to see a comprehensive set of containers rather than just one.
That lets you keep stockpiles, and the stuff in containers in the stockpiles.

(Very, very DF perspective......)
Title: Re: Stacking for meals
Post by: Armorat on March 21, 2014, 04:01:39 PM
There's an existing thread (http://ludeon.com/forums/index.php?topic=2428.msg22142) with some different ideas thrown around.