Topics

[authorized]

According to ludeon's reply, this topic may be regarded as a complaint about pretending to be ludeon / ludeon staff.
The translation is mainly by Google Translate, please allow me to apologize for the quality of the translation in advance
Due to screenshots of original evidence...had to go against LCR-19-English language to some extent
I'm not used to posting on BBS yet.....hope the format is normal




Happened in China, in a discord-like platform - Tencent's QQ



(The red box is the key claim part, see below for the specific text content and semi-manual translation)

Chinese original text of key content
这里是Rimworld官方交流群。「本群由Rimworld官方中文汉化组（边缘汉化组）和百度Rimworld吧务联合组织管理。」
Ps. 本群是拥有Rimworld游戏作者授权的官方群组，不存在盗版游戏本体。

The translation of the version I provide is
This is Rimworld's official communication forum. "This group is jointly organized by RimWorld-zh （Rimworld official Chinese translation team）and "RimWorld ba-administrator" .
Ps. This group is an official forum authorized by the Rimworld game author. There are no pirated games.
（June 09, 2022 renew. . . Google Translate really missed a keyword）


（The term "forum" as used herein refers to all public and private discussion platforms.
The original expression of the original text is "group"（群）, which can be understood as a communication platform like Discord）

It should be noted that - ludeon has never used the word "official" to describe the rimworld simplified Chinese translation, either in the rimworld's STEAM store page that says "all non-English translations are provided by fans."（所有非英语翻译均由粉丝提供）, or in the rimworld simplified Chinese game main interface "All translations of RimWorld are made by fans of this game" （RimWorld的所有翻译均由本游戏爱好者制作）in .
And ludeon uses ludeon to describe itself, not "Rimworld's official"

---

2 organizations appearing in this statement

-1-Rimworld official Chinese translation team（rimworld-zh 、 边缘汉化组）
https://rimworldzh.huijiwiki.com/wiki/About#
they describe themselves
-"The RimWorld-zh is a translation team constructed by duduluu and Biscuit.
We focus on translating RimWorld vanilla game and mods, including both of Simplified Chinese and Tranditianal Chinese."



rimworld-zh member list (lack of maintenance)

In fact, they use the logos of "边缘汉化组" and "rimworld-zh" in the STEAM workshop. In theory all uploaders using these logos are "highly likely" to be members of rimworld-zh


-2-"RimWorld ba-administrator"

People who manage baidu tieba (reddit in China) rimworlod ba.
https://tieba.baidu.com/f?ie=utf-8&kw=rimworld&fr=search



"RimWorld ba-administrator" 2019ver
Screenshot source -
https://weibo.com/ttarticle/p/show?id=2309404327748549128638
The red boxes are marked by the original screenshotters

---

And their names are in rimworld's credits



Red box - red marker for "RimWorld ba-administrator" 2019ver
Blue Box- Founder of rimworld-zh
Yellow box - both "RimWorld ba-administrator" 2019ver and rimworld-zh member list (lack of maintenance)
pink box - only rimworld-zh member list  (lack of maintenance)
Orange Box - only  "RimWorld ba-administrator" 2019ver

Also, this is just a preliminary identification.... the actual personnel may be more
And "RimWorld ba-administrator" has a 2022 version (but many people's nicknames have changed, do not confirm the situation)

This is about consumer rights.I sincerely hope to get a reply from Ludeon (RimWorld producer).
This topic will be saved in the form of screenshots.
This topic is translated using free translation software, translation quality cannot be guaranteed.

The right to criticize discussed in this topic does not include criticism of individuals, but only "games, modules, ideas, philosophies, opinions, religions, projects, social practices, companies, or non-human entities."

The purpose of this article is to clarify whether the right to criticize (not to individuals) is a right granted to RimWorld players by the owners of rimWorld.
In particular, some people claiming to be authorized by Tynan to manage rimWorld's forums are trying to take away critical rights from players
This action may lead to deviations in consumers' understanding of Ludeon Community rules.


As a consumer who purchases rimworld, I would like confirmation from Ludeon

Do players have the right to criticize mods and some behaviors such as copyright theft and bullying?（In particular, Through Ludeon Community Rules Rule1 emphasizes the player's right to criticize）

This topic is translated using free translation software, translation quality cannot be guaranteed.
This topic focuses on the birth of Rule 14 and some of the details of the IGNI's Lost Forest and RJW conflict.

In particular, some gamers still regard IGNI as a "tragic hero" who abandoned the mod's public creation due to the cyber violence of RJW players..... It ignores the birth of rule 14.

Digression: For IGNI's creations to suffer from "RJW", I say... Sympathy. I talk to a lot of modders (IGNI included) who treat their creations like their daughters... They are sad to see their creations suffer misfortune.


I would like confirmation from Ludeon (as the supreme arbiter of rimWorld mod community)
1-Was the creation of Rule 14 related to the IGNI Lost Forest hostile incompatible action?
2-IGNI's Lost Forest suffering "This item is incompatible with RimWorld." in RimWorld's STEAM workshop, was it a response from Ludeon?
3-Have Ludeon received reports of hostility incompatible action in IGNI's Lost Forest resulting in player saves being broken?