Messages

My post was nothing but my opinion :-)

And in my opinion co-op should support the highest possible amount of teamplay.

And the highest possible amount of teamplay is when cooperative playing is neccesary for both to survive. :-)

Co-op would be AWESOME!
PVP would change everything (like Tynan said, story!, not winning)
With the story events it would never be a fair 1v1

In my opinion 2 players in one colony would be better but every player has his own style how to build the colony, they could "block" each other.
The colonists limit should be for everyone himself like 6,7,8, whatever for each player or one of them would "steal" all the colonists they can get. (Or like Monopoly one house after another; one player after another :p)

But on the other Hand:
Two Colonys doesn't sound so awesome in my ears.
What if raider coming? Which one are they going to attack? If you, will the other player even care? If the other player, if you want to send him help, it may be a long way, will you be there soon enogh? Will you meet Raiders on your way? They wont simply ignore you.. But they can't simply attack you because there target was the other player. Well they can, but where is the team then? It would be more of attacking the raiders to prevent them to attack the other player. So you dont Need any turrets anymore because YOU are going to attack the raiders, not them you! I think it would't be Rimworld anymore..
Thats why I think two in one would be better and easier to establish, but the players really need to cooperate A LOT!