Quote from: Adamiks on May 28, 2015, 05:15:36 PMQuote from: TLHeart on May 28, 2015, 02:32:35 PMI agree with you. There is no really "true no" answer.
And the poll answer is stated so that even if we voted NO, it assumes we want it in the future, which many have stated NO to also.
I don't think that is necessarily an accurate assessment. The question does not seem designed, to me, to make any such assumption. Let's not turn this into another party line debate. In all the FoW polls and debates, probably the most under-represented views are those of the majority of forum members whose attitude is more: Meh... I can't be arsed to get worked up about it.
I think most people (in other words: me) figure that either some enterprising modder will produce something or Tynan will eventually have another crack and the question will become moot. In fact, RimWorld keeps developing and so far, almost every change does seem to improve the game.
This question actually allows those of us who don't want to feel we are being pressured into being either pro or anti FoW, as seems to be the case in many other threads, to indicate what areas of development we would like to see prioritised.