It's just faster; it's not the huge deal OP is making of it.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#62
General Discussion / Re: New Blight = dumb
August 05, 2020, 11:38:25 AM
*shrug* This may have been done, simply to reduce the "click load" and complexity of the game. While some immersion is ofc lost, OTOH the results are at least comparable to doing it the old, "right" way, with much less UI finagling.
In other words, the same basic mechanic is there, just simplified a bit. I liked the older way much better but can deal.
In other words, the same basic mechanic is there, just simplified a bit. I liked the older way much better but can deal.
#63
General Discussion / Re: When I put in hydroponics, my pawns stop planting in growing zones
August 05, 2020, 11:35:56 AMQuote from: Canute on August 05, 2020, 03:20:39 AM
Yeah maybe the fields need a big "X" overlay when you forbid sowing there! :-)
That's a good idea; an alpha-blended, dim "X" would help a LOT.
#64
General Discussion / Re: Zombrella?
August 04, 2020, 10:45:37 PMQuote from: mzonk on August 04, 2020, 01:27:52 PMThe reason I originally got character editor was so that I could add Curly Jo and Shev to Curlie, Larry and Mo. It failed."Shemp," if you're trying to copy the names directly .
#65
General Discussion / Re: New Blight = dumb
August 03, 2020, 10:06:50 AM
I have to agree, the new Blight mechanism is inferior.
#66
General Discussion / Re: Death chance on fail when installing bionic parts
July 08, 2020, 02:25:58 AMQuote from: Jean on July 08, 2020, 02:21:34 AMIf you're polite about it and follow the bug reporting guidelines, I highly doubt anyone will mind =).
Thank you for your response, I wanted confirmation that I would not bother a developer with an imaginary bug due to a misunderstanding of the game.
#67
General Discussion / Re: How to reverse finsish all research?!?!
June 26, 2020, 09:46:44 PM
Oh very well done, PicaMula *unsarcastic smattering of applause* .
#68
General Discussion / Re: Mods on Epic Games
June 14, 2020, 02:44:59 PM
It is.
You can, btw, link your Epic and Steam (And GoG and Uplay) accounts, so any launcher can lauch/mod/whatever the game, if present on any of them. This will give you full access to the Steam Workshop for RimWorld, for example.
You can, btw, link your Epic and Steam (And GoG and Uplay) accounts, so any launcher can lauch/mod/whatever the game, if present on any of them. This will give you full access to the Steam Workshop for RimWorld, for example.
#69
General Discussion / Re: What matters most in CPU for RimWorld, main core speed or multicores?
June 01, 2020, 12:13:38 PMQuote from: ProfZelonka on June 01, 2020, 04:21:51 AMMods that replace items/objects in the game increase load times.
The reason I'm asking about GPU is to get an idea if a lot of HD re-texture mods would slow down the CPU or if that would be a load for the GPU. With big colonies, every bit of performance counts!
Mods that add scripting/"per-tick" calculations decrease game speed.
"Quality of Life" (QoL) mods tend to have little to no impact, as they mainly change UI elements and similar tasks; they don't add a lot of processes to each turn.
It is completely possible for a given mod to add both types of slowdown. Additionally, there's no real upper limit on how much slowdown you add. Keep this in mind, when contemplating the addition of huge numbers of new mods ^^'.
#70
General Discussion / Re: What matters most in CPU for RimWorld, main core speed or multicores?
May 31, 2020, 11:53:12 PM
For RW and most current games, single-core and max possible speed are most important, not number of cores.
#71
General Discussion / Re: Oversight, missing key mood modifier
May 31, 2020, 04:18:20 AMQuote from: B@R5uk on May 14, 2020, 07:55:28 AMNot necessarily. Either mood can have a differing duration, for example (the rush of victory fades to aches and reflection on the loss of family and friends, perhaps).
I totally agree with TS!!! But, well, you know GD, this will offset all the debuffs of battle and make postfight cleaning piece of cake...
#72
General Discussion / Re: Long-winded Rant/Critique
May 28, 2020, 04:55:06 PM
I'm not saying your entire point is invalid but I literally NEVER (barring very long-term and/or early disaster) have issues with food in most biomes. Crop excess and finished meals are nearly always major trade goods, and I have to make sure and don't drive up my colony wealth too far with stored meals. I have been able to maintain this WITHOUT specialization in either hydroponics or Sun Lamp greenhouses, with enough storage to maintain through outrageously long toxic fallout or similar issues.
Food is nowhere as near as difficult to handle in RW as you're implying.
Food is nowhere as near as difficult to handle in RW as you're implying.
#73
General Discussion / Re: Long-winded Rant/Critique
May 26, 2020, 11:59:20 AM
"Serious tone"..?
Uh huh. *continues turning neighbors into hats*
Uh huh. *continues turning neighbors into hats*
#74
General Discussion / Re: botbot
May 21, 2020, 09:45:28 AM
While this particular post is useful as an example, in general it's best to NOT reply to such posts and just report them immediately. Otherwise, the bots they use often will note "interest" and spam even more ^^'.
#75
General Discussion / Re: Please explain me the world...
May 21, 2020, 09:42:46 AM
As mentioned above, RW is VERY open-ended. In this case, the original game didn't have a "victory" condition and was always just one colony. Because of this, to this day you *do not* actually ever have to leave your original colony's tile (barring disasters, of course) if you'd rather not.
If you don't plan on much, or even any caravanning (even to travel to a ship, in a later quest), there's really not much point in generating the entire rimworld you're on, beyond aesthetics. On the other hand, you can travel around the globe in all sorts of ways for many different reasons, from gathering resources to simple bloody conquest, if you prefer. In that case, generating more (or even 100%) of the globe makes a lot more sense.
Luckily, once you've passed the world-generation step, AFAIK there's little to no particular extra load on the game from generating a larger world (as opposed to using larger *tile maps*). So if you don't mind a short wait at the very beginning of the game, feel free to generate the whole globe (or not) as you like, w/o worrying about a performance hit, as long as it fits your playstyle =).
If you don't plan on much, or even any caravanning (even to travel to a ship, in a later quest), there's really not much point in generating the entire rimworld you're on, beyond aesthetics. On the other hand, you can travel around the globe in all sorts of ways for many different reasons, from gathering resources to simple bloody conquest, if you prefer. In that case, generating more (or even 100%) of the globe makes a lot more sense.
Luckily, once you've passed the world-generation step, AFAIK there's little to no particular extra load on the game from generating a larger world (as opposed to using larger *tile maps*). So if you don't mind a short wait at the very beginning of the game, feel free to generate the whole globe (or not) as you like, w/o worrying about a performance hit, as long as it fits your playstyle =).