Sneaky Tynan

Started by TwixFunSize, April 17, 2015, 01:21:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Demoulius

It would add a level of realism and some in-depth content to the game that I was kinda suprised it wasent in the game already. My first playthrough I ensured I kept at least 1 male and female of each animal in the field so they would keep producing animals for me to hunt later on and was suprised when after a year no one was hooked up yet. Specialy since I only had 1 guy with the rest all female colonists  ;D

The kids wouldnt me mature right away (I inmagine) and would take a good years before they would be usefull other then cleaning and hauling stuff as little young ones. They would be more a thing for the long term planner as I inmagine that early one they would only put a dent on already strained resources....like food  ::)

In all fairness though I think it would make a good addition to the game :)

StorymasterQ

This entire thread keeps my signature relevant. Love it :)
I like how this game can result in quotes that would be quite unnerving when said in public, out of context. - Myself

The dubious quotes list is now public. See it here

Kirid

I figured it was just an unfinished interaction for colonists having time alone in their rooms relaxing, checking out furniture, sitting in a chair, etc. Only after I saw them standing in place with their backs turned enough times did I conclude this is what it is, and the forums confirmed it. 'Private time' or 'Alone time' shouldn't be anything perverted, it's just wanting time alone from all the other people. And if they do want to 'enjoy themselves' why not add part of the action for them to just lie in bed for awhile. You could use you own imagination to conclude they are masturbating, or just napping, or just day-dreaming.
Even after realizing it's supposed to be 'jerking off' I still find it weird. They huddle in the corner or stare at a wall like some sex-crazed fiend.
It just seems like this joy action could've been approached a little more maturely instead of like a snickering 13 year old boy. Now I have colonists jerking off constantly, and it's pretty obvious, not sneaky at all.
I know cannibalism and slavery exist in the game, I find those acts disgusting, but I ultimately have a choice whether my colonists do them or not. As a player I am given no choice over watching my colonists jerk off daily. I have no huge problem with personally, but I'm sure someone will find it grotesque.
You can't rollerskate in a muffalo herd

Demoulius

poor colonists :( noone wants them to get any fun-time....

Necronomocoins

If Tynan is trying to censor his own works and ideas as he creates this, the end product will suffer. If sexless-ness was a part of his original vision, the addition of sexual contact would be bad and best left to the modding community if added at all.

daveboy2000

Quote from: Kirid on April 20, 2015, 01:34:47 AM
-snip-
Well, prostitution and sex slavery are already part of the lore, thanks to histories. So sexuality is pretty unavoidable already. And honestly, I don't see anything wrong with it. Sure it's a little odd to do it like that, but they don't have bathrooms to do it at either, and I've yet to see a washing machine for the bed sheets.

amul

Quote from: Kirid on April 20, 2015, 01:34:47 AM
I figured it was just an unfinished interaction for colonists having time alone in their rooms relaxing, checking out furniture, sitting in a chair, etc. ...
Even after realizing it's supposed to be 'jerking off' I still find it weird. They huddle in the corner or stare at a wall like some sex-crazed fiend.
.... As a player I am given no choice over watching my colonists jerk off daily. I have no huge problem with personally, but I'm sure someone will find it grotesque.

I would argue that as a player, you absolutely have a choice on how to interpret anything you see on screen. In this case, you could easily choose to interpret the private time behavior to include "avoiding eye contact with the all-seeing overseer."

bartekkru100

Quote from: daveboy2000 on April 20, 2015, 06:22:03 PM
Quote from: Kirid on April 20, 2015, 01:34:47 AM
-snip-
Well, prostitution and sex slavery are already part of the lore, thanks to histories. So sexuality is pretty unavoidable already. And honestly, I don't see anything wrong with it. Sure it's a little odd to do it like that, but they don't have bathrooms to do it at either, and I've yet to see a washing machine for the bed sheets.
Washing machines for bed sheets, that has made my day. :D

chino2468

I don't know if this has been addressed, but there's a stockpile issue where these guys will waste 5 spots with 1x Simple Meal piles, instead of having a single spot with the 5x Simple Meals together xd
Having some kind of barrel/crate/bag system as in DF would be really handy :)

AllenWL

Quote from: amul on April 22, 2015, 02:55:19 PM
Quote from: Kirid on April 20, 2015, 01:34:47 AM
I figured it was just an unfinished interaction for colonists having time alone in their rooms relaxing, checking out furniture, sitting in a chair, etc. ...
Even after realizing it's supposed to be 'jerking off' I still find it weird. They huddle in the corner or stare at a wall like some sex-crazed fiend.
.... As a player I am given no choice over watching my colonists jerk off daily. I have no huge problem with personally, but I'm sure someone will find it grotesque.

I would argue that as a player, you absolutely have a choice on how to interpret anything you see on screen. In this case, you could easily choose to interpret the private time behavior to include "avoiding eye contact with the all-seeing overseer."
Until you look at the joy meter and see 'lewd' joy increasing, but yes, much of the game is up to interpretation(and willful ignorance)

cultist

#25
Quote from: Necronomocoins on April 20, 2015, 05:38:58 PM
If Tynan is trying to censor his own works and ideas as he creates this, the end product will suffer. If sexless-ness was a part of his original vision, the addition of sexual contact would be bad and best left to the modding community if added at all.

If Rimworld had an ESRB rating, it would be M for sure - the game features cannibalism, violence, drugs, nudity, alcohol, 90-year old sex slaves(!) etc. etc. I'm not reallly seeing a whole lot of censoring here. Replacing "private time" with "wanking" isn't going to make this game more mature, surprisingly...

Quote from: Kirid on April 20, 2015, 01:34:47 AM
It just seems like this joy action could've been approached a little more maturely instead of like a snickering 13 year old boy. Now I have colonists jerking off constantly, and it's pretty obvious, not sneaky at all.
I know cannibalism and slavery exist in the game, I find those acts disgusting, but I ultimately have a choice whether my colonists do them or not. As a player I am given no choice over watching my colonists jerk off daily. I have no huge problem with personally, but I'm sure someone will find it grotesque.

The feature is not even available in a public build yet. Give him a chance to fine-tune their um... needs.

Kolljak

Cmon you guys remeber alpha 8 right :D when men could be pregnant.... ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE in rimworld

http://i.imgur.com/IU9WIsS.jpg

Jarwy

Quote from: nottma on April 19, 2015, 03:15:32 AM
Child labor? Raiders killing children? Eating Children? Oh that is a dark path to go down...

Come on, now. The main use for unproductive colonists like that would be to stand them in front of your snipers during battle.

Tynan

Tynan Sylvester - @TynanSylvester - Tynan's Blog

Listen1