I've banished a royal that I was supposed to safeguard against incoming raids. However she just wanders around doing nothing (she is wounded, if that's of any importance). Similar thing happened when I failed the refugee quest. I arrested one of the refugees during his mental break and refugees decided to leave. Except the wounded ones didn't; they behaved like "transport pod crash" guests, lying in beds for days and waiting to recover fully, even though they were able to walk.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages1
#2
Bugs / [1.1] Some pawns will decline to do recreational activities no matter what
February 18, 2020, 06:00:06 AM
One pawn in my current savegame didn't attempt to do anything recreational and stayed at -20 penalty, even though I have horseshoes and chess available on top of three basic activities. I even disallowed every work type for him and set every hour to recreation. The condition cleared after his first mental break. He joined my colony as a captured pirate fallen from the orbit, if it is of any help.
#3
General Discussion / Duster + Flak Vest sometimes worse than Flak Vest alone?
August 08, 2019, 09:21:22 AM
As far as I understand armor system in 1.0, bullet has a chance to be deflected/mitigated according to Sharp armor value. On mitigation it proceeds to the next layer as blunt damage (while keeping "armor penetration" value).
That means that for high-quality vests, wearing duster over them is harmful, since duster often "passes down" a mitigated blunt bullet, and vests suck against blunt. Let's assume bullet with AP 27% (standard bolt-action) hits a pawn that wears excellent thrumbofur duster and legendary flak vest underneath. Sharp armor of a duster is 81%, while sharp and blunt armors of a vest are 180% and 65%.
Vest without a duster simply deflects the bullet in (180-27)/2 = 76.5% of cases and mitigates it otherwise.
Duster deflects a bullet with a chance of (81-27)/2 = 27%, has the same chance of mitigation, and passes the bullet unaffected in 46% of cases. In case of mitigation, vest deflects a (now blunt) bullet in (65-27)/2 = 19% of cases and mitigates it for the second time with the same chance. In case of being passed, vest deflects a (still sharp) bullet in (180-27)/2 = 76.5% of cases and mitigated it otherwise. So, overall result looks like that: 67.32% deflected, 27.55% mitigated, 5.13% mitigated twice.
I hope to be proved wrong, since I don't like it.
That means that for high-quality vests, wearing duster over them is harmful, since duster often "passes down" a mitigated blunt bullet, and vests suck against blunt. Let's assume bullet with AP 27% (standard bolt-action) hits a pawn that wears excellent thrumbofur duster and legendary flak vest underneath. Sharp armor of a duster is 81%, while sharp and blunt armors of a vest are 180% and 65%.
Vest without a duster simply deflects the bullet in (180-27)/2 = 76.5% of cases and mitigates it otherwise.
Duster deflects a bullet with a chance of (81-27)/2 = 27%, has the same chance of mitigation, and passes the bullet unaffected in 46% of cases. In case of mitigation, vest deflects a (now blunt) bullet in (65-27)/2 = 19% of cases and mitigates it for the second time with the same chance. In case of being passed, vest deflects a (still sharp) bullet in (180-27)/2 = 76.5% of cases and mitigated it otherwise. So, overall result looks like that: 67.32% deflected, 27.55% mitigated, 5.13% mitigated twice.
I hope to be proved wrong, since I don't like it.
Pages1