Messages

It can happen out of sheer sexual frustration, stress, or mental health decline.

Seems realistic, but I would hope this would be more likely when stressed out.

Fun fact : reed vs reed was about MEN (people with penises) and women (people with vaginas). Transgender, transexuals, and others were never mentioned in it, therefore its not unconstitutional, and its not even really bigoted, unless you mean bigoted towards pedophiles. Its just that the mentally ill have highjacked the term "gender".

Granted, albeit the definition of activist rant is so vague, and is defined by people who make them, similar to the bathroom bill, meaning you are only making an activist rant if you SAY its an activist rant : this means that any and all TRULY HORRIFIC activist rants, like promoting pedophilia, is taken as "just a joke" by everyone. Only an idiot would say he was making an activist rant as it then subjects him to nasty consequences : or maybe not, considering the supreme court just ruled that hate speech is covered under free speech  As a side effect as well, if you say someone cannot say something, it is not only bigoted to say so, but you are also labeled as someone who cannot take a joke. This also ends up leading to a 50 year period of death of mainstream humor.

I wish I could turn water into wine.

Granted, albiet this motivates him to ban muslims entirely from America with means which make the Spanish inquisition seems like childs play. He invades Europe, capturing merkel and executing her, and saves Europe from rape gangs, and frees all people jailed for "hate speech". People end up calling him a nazi, forgetting that muslims were a big nazi ally. Antifa goes full retard, and martial law / open season is allowed on them, and over the course of a month this raises the average american IQ 10 points.

Whats more important, is your post is connected as the cause of all this, and underground ISIS people end up slaughtering you in your home. Don't worry though, its still a religion of peace, and the people will be brought to justice due to trumps "racist" policies

I wish people against bathroom bills in america could actually address the problem, that legally any man CAN walk into a womans bathroom, by just SAYING hes a girl at the time, and asking any more questions than that is considered a hate crime.  (seriously, BY LAW, men can walk into womens restrooms if they say they are a man, but everyone just denies this and says its silly : such men are protected by law in some places.)

Lets be VERY clear on your "position" keg.

You say I'm "ego centrist" which is a personal attack irrelevant to debate : a ego centrist could still be 100% correct, its off topic to call me it, and says NOTHING for the topic.

You say you "don't have time" to debate, but continue making off topic posts about criticisms of me so much as believing brietbart has any merit (Its not even in my main news consumption...) or that I'm egocentric. You still aren't making any real criticism on the debate, you are attacking THE lowest hanged fruit, and ignoring core arguments.

You do not address rape and molestation rates in Germany and Sweden (which highly correlate to immigrants, as well as reports showing its overwhelmingly immigrants)

You do not address the political correctness giving islam an advantage in these societies

You do not address connections between immigrants and ISIS

You call be a a bigot, and prejudice, without even knowing what the damn words mean.

HERE, let me help.

Bigot means to be intolerant of other opinions : and I'm tolerant of them, but I openly criticize ones that are dangerous. I'm less bigoted than antifa, BLM, and other groups, as these people actually ATTACK people they disagree with. So don't call me a bigot, you bigot. Heck, islam itself is far more bigoted, as it JAILS people who criticize it under sharia law or in some places in europe. So muslims are the bigots here.

prejudice means to pre-judge someone, without full information : and this frankly does not apply here : I am talking about GROUPS, and not explicitely pushing them on individuals. Prejudice would be saying a trump supporter is a redneck hick with a refridgerator IQ : even if you meet one, and they clearly have a higher one. (or are black : yes, black people support trump, and hate BLM, even though stating this openly would get them KILLED)

Also, you are right, I'm NOT entitled to an answer, you can continue being a dork making off topic posting, but you are contributing nothing to the discussion AT ALL.

If all you have is personal attacks and name calling, don't post anymore : I've been banned before for off topic posting, and these rules should apply to you as well, I at least TRY to make each post link into the topic. Its my topic, and I want DISCUSSION, not childish name calling or personal attacks, so stay out of my thread UNLESS you want to address core arguments which make up the bulk of my point, rather than namecall like a gradeschooler trying to shut me up.

And the far left is the extremist group of this time : antifa, BLM, Islamic aggression on many countries, and trying to divide us along race, sex, and other crap, while we ignore the takeover.

heh, an FTL mod of rimworld would be absolutely SWEET to see, even though it would be a ton of work.

As I said, mis translating something about community service and rape is nearly impossible : and this immense BIAS on the left its a major problem : just today I had people saying at a fair that CNN was always right, and fox is always wrong : but this is being in an echo chamber, refusing to check other sources

Beyond that, LGBT get to show crap like a gay jesus fish with dick fish swimming into its asshole, why can't I do the same with mohammad in europe, without being jailed / beheaded?

Especially since theres so many muslims in jail, and they use jail to convert people. One guy actually DIED in jail after he was jailed for a YEAR due to putting bacon on a mosques door step.

Islam is incredibly hostile, and the issues with jail conversion, rape, molestation, removal of free speech, ect, is pretty much sharia law in practice, even if its not formally in law.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weGxSWl5oA8

Oh also its not racism : its a bad, horribly flawed ideology. People criticize Christianity with no end, but call it "Islamophobia" if its islam. This isn't equal rights, this is demanding superiority while playing the victim, and this is INTOLERABLE if the people doing it themselves are brutal and violent, and causing damage.

Political correctness needs to die before it ends up killing more people.

keg, this is why I have issues with you, and sometimes others : I don't mind disagreements, I really don't (infact I rather enjoy them) but as much as I welcome disagreements, what you and others often resort to is just that : to accuse someone of fallacies without listing them, say sources are crap without debating why, and saying theories are true without providing evidence towards them.

If you have caught me using fallacies : point out why so it can be debated, and understood EXACTLY what you are talking about. As much as Milon HATES off topic, I gotta say I figure (sorry for speaking for you milon!) that he would prefer off topic movements to clairify understanding to conflicts / animosity on the forum.

If you have an issue with a source, such as brietbart, raise the issue directly : and conversely, allow cross examination

This is how discussion works, and when you take the approach you do, of walking off in a huff when someone doesn't side with you, then it only makes you look bad : that aside, if you REALLY believe in an idea, you should allow it to be questioned, and answer such questions : to either re-affirm a good belief, or compromise a bad belief by showing its flaws.

For instance, your views on brietbart : which for the record, you can hate as much as you want, just as much as I hate pinknews. But if you wish to express this in a public square, either prepare to 1: explain your reasoning and answer questions. Yes, this may very well mean LOTS of questions (seriously, anyone on the forum can ask me damn near anything, short of personal information) 2 : have people criticize, and disagree with your views, especially if you do not stand up to questioning, or 3 : just don't talk about it

Oh and don't play as if "you don't have time" for this : you are taking the time to look at my thread and post, yet say you don't have time to make any critical, informative posts : I welcome debate, but if you don't have time to make a well thought out post that addresses as much criticism as possible, perhaps you simply should not post? I suppose it is your right, and I cannot take it away from you, but otherwise you just look like a snarky scoofer, which is useless to a discussion.

AGAIN : I'm fully willing to have discussions with people, and hear opinions I'm foriegn to / do not agree with, but you must make a case, and defend against criticism if you want to be taken serious : I had one woman on here literally advocate for bestiality on here, and she was more convincing in her argument BECAUSE she actually accepted and tried to address criticisms : and thats a bit sad.

I don't WANT to believe europe is being besieged from within, but don't just say "mumble uses fallacy and brietbart is bad", and try and walk out on the debate there : its no better than antifa spouting crap about "Racist sexist antiqueer, bigots are not welcome here", and then refusing to even address where they say the racism, sexism, antiqueer, or bigotry allegedly was. If you indeed see something, point it out and explain it : ANYONE can accuse ANYONE of ANYTHING, but proving is where the rubber hits the road : Explain where my fallacy is and counter at least HALF my points on brietbart, and then I will take you serious alright?

Also, one VERY important thing to keep in mind : yes, I am not in Europe, but Europe is also HIGHLY anti free speech at the moment. One guy in Scotland got arrested for making his girlfriends dog jump around when he said "gas the jews" : about as serious as a fart joke and he even admitted nazis were "the least cute thing in the world". And in other places theres a massive crack down on anti muslim, anti immigrant rhetoric. This in turn means voices are SILENCED in Europe, so I wish to speak for the ones SCARED to speak there. Beyond that, if anyone can voice anti christian, anti white, anti straight opinions, its completely within my right to voice any opinions I have or else I do not have the same rights as others, which is FAR worse an issue than any anti xyz talk.

I admit its why I like the rimworld community as much as I do milon.

Its kind of interesting, I suspect its BECAUSE rimworld as a game demands a certain level of maturity, and nobody without it would be really interested in the game to begin with. Some might say this is a bad thing, excluding others, but I think its VERY good : especially as I have some extremely controversial viewpoints, and can express them here safely. Especially when now, Facebook for instance is cooperating with Pakistan in investigations of homosexual posts, posts which are blasphemous, which is leading to the death penalty.. essentially they have blood on their hands, and despite supporting gay rights are allowing killing of homosexuals overseas. Facebook is now an accessory to murder, in my opinion, or at LEAST has blood on their hands.
http://www.alternet.org/world/coming-out-facebook-may-soon-be-death-sentence-saudi-arabia
https://techcrunch.com/2017/06/13/man-in-pakistan-sentenced-to-death-for-blasphemous-facebook-comments/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKf_GR79ZTA
Its rather ironic, because, despite being anti LGBT, I find facebooks willingness to do that abhorent, but I suppose its because I think actions speak louder than words,  and despite my disagreement, they deserve chances at redemption, rather than a cruel death. Ideals should stand on their own merits, all of which to be openly criticized, and "winners" picked after carefully examining all information.

EVERYONE should be able to spread ideas, and EVERYONE should be able to criticize EVERY IDEA. Even as a christian, PLEASE, criticize as much as you want the bible and god, but allow me to do the same for anything else : And inversely, defend your point with logical discussion, and expect me to defend my points.

--------------

Beta, you make an interesting point : I suspect this honestly might even be a playing factor in black communities in the US, due to them FEELING like they do not belong : and this is one of the reasons I'm a nationalist, because a national identity DOES indeed help group cohesion, and those who it doesn't help are typically refusing to have a national identity. Its actually funny thinking about this, because thinking back, the black people who have always been the most likable / sociable that I have met have NOT identified as black as the PRIMARY thing about them, and 2, did not have an immense amount of discontent towards whites.

I think this is a big factor : trying to focus on what makes us the same, unless something which is different is KNOWN to also be a damaging factor, and is proven to be the case : otherwise its assuming malice, and that gets us nowhere : its why BLM and other groups have worsened racial tensions, is they insist white people are horrible, racist, hateful, ect, and demand you support them / obey them, and if not, that is proof you are a racist : and this in no way makes friends or allies, and if I'm honest, can CAUSE racism and hate towards any group : its just the way the mind works, if a group has a consistent pattern of doing something, you create a stereotype of it. And I have certainly seen racism get worse in people I know BECAUSE of such things : strangely, this even applies to the rather ironfisted LGBT policies in some cities. Point is, you CANNOT make someone accept you if you start off being rude to them for not agreeing with you.

Beyond that, as you said beta, differences which are voluntary are actually bad for cohesion and unity : this is why the military for so long had you shave your head, use the same clothes, ect, because they wanted you to be a SOLDIER in a UNIT, of other SOLDIERS : not worry about if the other guys white, black, ect, but worry about them being a soldier. The problem is, when a difference goes from involuntary (race, sex, physical build, ect) to voluntary (self expression, gender expression, cultural expression, religion expression, clothes, ect), that this can provide a problem : involuntary differences are accepted for the most part because people know it cannot be changed : no black person can choose to be white, and no woman can choose to have a penis when she has a vagina : but voluntary differences act very different : everyone knows in the end, you can choose how you act, what you talk about, dress, ect, so this difference is not just a difference, but a CHOICE to be different : which builds more division in a group potentially. Not saying people cannot make different choices, but the more different you CHOSE to be, the less cohesion you can expect within your group you are choosing to be different from, and this is critically important if you choose to be different from one of the things that unite the group. (like a group of a church going atheist, then getting alienated.)

Course, thats not even to say the japanese are wrong : racial divides do indeed cause issues with family and self identity (not so much wider spread culture), so its not necessarily a bad idea to have a group isolated to breed with / commune with its own group, but when working within a group of multi racial / ethnic groups, cohesion plays a part far more, and this is something to take into account, while left to their own devices, each group having their own segregated group is not bad for upbringing / family strength. Outside that, having SOMETHING held in common with all helps : church, patriotism, something.

As for TYTs, I cannot take them serious : wasn't that the show where some snobby bitch said she was better than everyone who criticizes her?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhwpvzc8pAE
Yeah.....I CANNOT take them serious
not that I can blame you, I was subscribed to them back in the day, but began to see their trashy double standards.

I will say, mentioning size in the UI being similar is redundant : a thrombo is maybe 3 times the size of a human, but hp wise, several fold bigger.

The current system just doesn't do "scale" of pawns justice.

DPS is also less important in this game than burst damage, and incap chance : for instance, a mini-gun has a pretty good dps, but is NOT good for centipedes, because the bullets do such tiny damage, and have little chance of in-capping : while a sniper round, or charge lance in this case, instantly destroys most things. So comparatively, if you compare a survival rifle in cases of torso shots, leg shots, head-shots, neck shots, ect, the lance is more powerful, because each of those is deadly (or incaps) while the rifle isn't.

As for balance, balance was already bad before with getting charge rifles and power armor on year one, imagine getting heavy charge blasters and inferno cannons...that would be balance breaking.

THAT I can actually understand beta (though seriously, WHAT book did they cite? I'll judge if its KKK stuff myself...for all I know you could be talking about the bible lol. And more importantly, is the stuff cited FACTUAL? some would say "white girl bleed a lot" was a KKK book, but it was literally a list of events where black people assaulted whites in racially motivated incidents, which, strangely, WEREN'T counted as hatecrimes)

More importantly, I've seen a fluxuation along the years where news sources get better, or worse. CNN used to be not terrible, but now its bad. Fox used to be full of retractions and illogical BS, but is now not bad.

I think that this just changes with management, anchors, staff, ect : its like any company, the company is not the same as 20 years ago because 20 years ago it was different staff, making a different company : which is why I say you should read / judge each article rather than say "ew (insert news source) is a horrible news source!", or on the other end, believe a news source without any good logic behind it

This is where its tricky, and most mess up : theres BS on the right AND left, but you must be able to sniff out the bullshit where ever it is, and look for truth even if you disagree with it.

Maybe in 5 years brietbart will literally be without any citations, and will advocate for violence, and CNN will be all hard facts and hard questions : who knows, but in the meantime, you must read as much as you can, and be critical of it.

In the end, ACCURACY is more important than "hate speech" or "homophobia" or "islamaphobia" or "racism" or "sexism" or any of that. Even though you might not like it, facts give no fucks about your feelings, and NO amount of feelings change FACTS.

EDIT : this is interesting..  http://www.express.co.uk/travel/articles/753542/safe-holiday-destinations-summer-2017-europe

Cant help but notice it seems places with more migrants are most dangerous...or is that just me?

Valve releases, I just suspect they have gotten so sidetracked with csgo, tf2, l4d1 and 2, portal, and other things that they continue to maintain, that they dont really care about say, halflife 3.

Besides hl3 would never live up to hype, its impossible

Tynan typically spaces them out a bit, and doesn't project a schedule. But I suspect this will be a BIGGER update, since this one was smaller.

My guess is 8 or 9 months out from now, possibly with some new neato features.

Course, dont even worry about an exact number : tynans policy on release dates is "when its done".

citations

aren't most of those people sharing theories? no worse than CNN saying trump being elected wont happen.

And as for protesters, half the fuckers of antifa are homeless who are infact given money to act like hooligans. They are just an incredibly xenophobic group, and don't talk to outsiders so finding hard documentable proof of this is difficult, but its obvious antifa, bamn, BLM, and other groups are not surfing upon their OWN money. (besides that, they are legally definable as terrorists)

Global warming still has the science out on it on if its catostrophic as people claim (and we are projected to cool down a few degrees)

And transgender bathroom law HAS lead to an increase of men dressing as women doing innapropriate things in womens bathrooms...moving on

brietbart supports hatecrime

Where? Also you are assuming context : its like if I accused you of wanting to decapitate kittens : its a baseless accusation and defamation of charecter. They don't show any indication of WANTING hate crimes to spread that is you being a paranoid fear mongerer with no basis.

Another thing about hate crime which I mentioned again : its less about hate crime and more about CRIME : if you have a white guy who gets in fights with people, he will INVARIABLY commit a hate crime if he fights anyone whos not white, straight, male, and whatever religion he is. Otherwise if he beats up a gay man, muslim, black man, transgender, or whatever, with a side of shit talking : guess what? IMMEDIATELY its a hate crime. But that has nothing to do with the guy being a violent man DOES it? Hate crime law is actually damaging for america and europe, putting people who are more innocent than the law suggests in jail for MUCH longer than is necessary. Infact your link about hate crime is redundant, because its less a reflection of "more hatred" against blacks or gays - people have hated gays and blacks since the dawn of time, these are just recordings of ENFORCEMENTS of the law, which have gone up : and some of those are from black people hurting white people, like the apes who cut a chunk out of a disabled white mans skull. But you don't want to talk about that compared to a white guy just calling a black guy a nigger, DO you?

I'm  actually very GLAD you brought up milo : he was an interesting guy, and I'm THANKFUL he tried to kill poliitical correctness, but I think he also demonstraights an interesting symptom of homosexuality : and that is that bitterness in the opposite sex is VERY easy to foster, easier than in straight men, because straight men STILL want to fuck women. But gay or lesbian, if you have any idealogy which devalues the opposite sex, it can easily lead to bitterness : which I still think milo is not (half his posts are more saying LOTS of women are negatively influence by feminism, or that men and women have REAL differences we must account for). Even the things about women on frontlines (in a sub is NOT a front line dangerous job, being a marine raiding a terrorist hideout is) has validity : we don't WANT women blown up, crippled from mortars, or have to bury them due to an IED turning a woman into a fine red mist : yet this is hateful towards woman? if I said I DID want a woman to get blown up, is that loving? Fuck off. Oh and laws and human rights are a social construct. Not to say they are bad, but they better have good reason backing them up : its legal in iran to throw homosexuals off buildings then mutilate their bodies : Do you support that buddy?

hatred

I really don't think you even grasp what hatred is, nor do you grasp what Christianity is about.

The point of the analogy was its a 1 way street : commonly gay people can FORCE christians to do something they find reprehensible or shut them down : and this is not even because they cannot otherwise find a cake, this is opportunistically bullying christians, seeking out a christian bakery (they aren't that common) and intentionally fucking with them. Meanwhile if you ask for a cake about traditional family christian values, and a cake about bible quotes how homosexuals will die with their blood on their hands, this is denied : this illustrates homosexuals and christians are not treated equally and fairly on protected class grounds.

And beyond that, I think people SHOULD be able to deny service for morale reasons

If a gay person wants to deny me because I want them to do things they find morally wrong, they should have the right, as should Christians : but I guess you think only gay people should have that right? I also think its funny they won't try this with muslims at any point.

Also I understand the law, and I understand the law is shit and needs to be revised, as it causes MORE damage than it helps : honestly think for a second put yourself in the shoes of a kid whos dads bakery shut down because some homsexuals put him out of  buisness, and his kid being told this : Your fathers buisness, all his hard work, shut down because some homosexual screamed about "discrimination", even when he suggested other bakeries, and wanted to compromise on OTHER cakes : but no, father is put out of buisness, and tons of savings go down the drain  : Do you think this would make you want to respect gays, or want to lynch them like ACTUAL violence against gays?

Fallacies about health

No. Even with the higher population, you cannot say that without saying obama should of not been elected, because IIRC kerry or another person got more votes too, so don't even bitch unless you want to say obama should not of been elected. But that would make you a racist in your own eyes wouldn't it?

Its less about what happens when IN office, but remember people talking about mcain, who was old but in amazing shape? that was a concern, and people were ALL over it, but you got hilary whos actually collapsing, flipping out, and looking like shes not well at all, and you say we cannot worry

Furthermore its a worry about recovery : a faint when in office, 1 time, as an isolated incident can happen, due to dehydration or  whathave you, but hilary was dragged by her staff, collapsed on stage, looked like she was hallucinating...it wasn't an isolated incident, she seemed like something BIG was wrong with her during this, or at very least like she had regular problems with health. THAT was the worry.

And let us not forget, the left obsessed over donald trumps mental health because some random "psychologist" said he seemed like he had anger issues, without any formal diagnosis, or critical issues from it.

I refuse to comment on where I am In europe

Then I'm going to assume you are tucked in a corner of a world free from the worst of immigrants : I can live in say, the bible belt of america and say america is christian, live in san francisco and say america is all about gay rights, or live in texas and say america is all about guns : Each of this points has bias, and it matters less what I think, and if theres data to back it up being right, and if its in law (like the 2nd amendment.)

So yeah, if you refuse to answer, then you saying you are unaffected is nothing more than an anecdote. It also doesn't help that, even if you got your daughter raped by immigrants last night, saying it online COULD get you arrested for hate speech over there : so I'm more likely to believe a European to American immigrant, than some guy supposedly SOMEWHERE in europe, supposedly....maybe its jordan?

And over all, I find it DISGUSTING you completely ignore any of brietbarts studies or evidence for any of the stuff listed in the cracked article, yet call them awful : You want to just ignore any science that brietbart cites, cause brietbart. Its actually a sickening habit, where people can hear cold hard proof of something, and reject it outright because "well, its not CNN saying it, so its probably fake". Why not examine the study itself?

Which country is that? It also doesn't help if you are indeed in VERY wealthy areas, as you will naturally be AWAY from the problems common people face.

I hope you keep this crap in mind

You say "unverified" and "demonstrated false" but do not cite anything with it. Thankfully you provided a link, so I'll demolish that.

1: quotes : This is done by news companies of ALL sorts, ALL the time, cnn, fox, msnbc, ect. Ever seen a quote along the lines of "We will build America... ... ... with the help of our allies" or something similar? This means text was cut out. What matters here is NOT if stuff was cut out, but if its accurate, and in these statements,  even in the articles they mention, it seems very accurate. Worst one in the article is where obama was reported by his team to "be the closest thing to a jew" (ironic since the jewish friends I have think hes a muslim, and hate him), in that its an alleged reporting from his team, but its still that far off : and the hypothetical example with trump they list is so completely different, and just a stretch to make a poop joke about trump. Sad. At best what they accuse them of is not an exact quote in the title, because fitting the whole quote in the title would take up half the page, even though they effectively said the same thing.

2: I don't think brietbart EVER tried to say hatecrimes do not exist : this is a strawman by cracked's part, which instantly makes me think CRACKED is worthless as news. They are showing fake hate crimes are a serious problem, and they are. Its ALSO important to keep in mind hate crimes are not all equal : killing an entire family of jewish / whatever minority you want to insert, is NOTHING compared to calling someone a slur : And this is beyond the fact I think hate crimes are stupid, and you should be arrested on actions, not motiv : this is mainly used as a political tool to oppress people : for instance, what if a gay person beats up a christian for not agreeing? not a hatecrime. What if a revenge beating happens, and the person is called a faggot during it? Hatecrime. Its hypocritical to begin with, motive should not matter as much as actions : If I beat someone, me saying nasty words or not should have nothing to do with the fact I beat them up. Even southpark understood this "hate crime law, a vicious hipocracy"

But beyond my personal views, they never advocated that hate crimes don't happen. But I do agree with them that people should be allowed to say "gay, faggot, and queer", because freedom of speech is important : people are free to dislike me if I spew it everywhere, but it shouldn't be punished just for being used sparingly. not by law, and not by employers.

3 : This is more a disagreement on what constitutes "a war on women" by either party. The left often says slut shaming, promoting traditional gender roles, and chivalry is "a war on women" when really its promoting good, healthy values, good for men AND for women : Whores tend not to be very well off, traditional women tend to have more successful marriage, and chivalry allows for good women, and gentle men. However they also ignore things like islamic families doing honor killings for daughters attending a dance, even in america, FGM, treatment of women as property in other cultures, ect... meanwhile brietbart is pretty much the opposite, promoting traditional aspects for the most part, and calling out oppressive cultures, and promiscuity, which is damaging to women, and society.

Basically it depends if you think telling a woman to not be a whore is worse than treating women as property and killing them for acting like a "whore". Though really, the expression on BOTH sides is a bit sensationalist, even if one is more valid.

I also find it odd they brush over the idea of the stomping on freedom of religion, but then point on stomping on "womans rights" despite the fact women have the right to chose who they sleep with. And they mock brietbart to ignore the article of mental health risks of abortion : something I've grown to expect, being a scoffers. Scroffers cannot be taken seriously whatsover, so this has already shown to me to take this sight with a handful of salt. Infact it gets worse, as they list articles which shows DATA, and cracked responds with something along the lines of "riiiight, its SOOOOO baaaad isn't it?". Theres no scientific discussion, just being a pompous ass. And the last thing they list with drinking while pregnant, the article actually makes an interesting point, about how drugs might not be AS bad as expected. And the OP was not saying "it was healthy for her to drink alchohol for me", he was saying he was glad she drank, RATHER than abort him : and I agree, just like I'd rather get screamed at than stabbed. Doesn't mean I want people to scream at me, just means it lesser of two evils. Though I DO need to acknowlege that yes, keeping chemicals out of the system entirely IS preferred.

YES, brietbart is kinda bad at slightly clickbaitish titles, which generate clicks : but this is so common I cannot really fault them. Especially since their articles (which cracked apparently doesn't read) actually contain interesting stuff.

4 : This I find rather ironic : again, ignoring a lot of information.

They particularly ignore any mention of transexual sex offenses out there : which actually prompts an interesting question : does a transexual instantly become a cis male when commiting sexual assault?

In all seriousness, the stories are mentioned because, legally speaking, there is NO way to keep a man outside a bathroom now if he SAYS he is a woman : you say your a woman, you get in. And these are examples of that. This is why I say transgenders MUST be better defined before they get any special rights, period. Otherwise you get these abuses : hell, in seattle, a liberal bastion, one man legally went into a womans lockerrooms around little girls and couldn't be kicked out cause he said he was a woman, and he had no hormones, dress, or even shaved face. I also suspect one says a man with stubble, a dress, who calls himself a girl is a "transexual" if they are beaten up, but if they molest a child, they will call the same person a "cis male" . This is why I HATE transexuality : its so vague that anyone can warp it anyway they want. Theres no definition, its just a title thrown around, and mental abnormality.

Its even worse when they talk about religious freedom vs homosexual militancy, where buisnesses are shut down because "embrace homosexuality, OR ELSE", and people allow it. And yet they coyly talk like they have no idea what the problem is : bs. If a homosexual bakery can refuse to bake a cake with a bible quote about homosexuals having their blood upon them, then a christian bakery can refuse to make a homosexual cake. But this shows that there is indeed privilege in america for SOME groups.

5 : Considering people have called me a nazi for not thinking trump is that bad, frankly I don't give a damn. Besides some of the articles are true, jews having guns would of made ww2 less catastrophic.

Seriously, lots of others on the left make comparisons to hitler, nazis, halocaust, and MANY people said trump was pretty much hitler : so this stuff is BS, because the left is no better at all.

6 : Lol, hilary? Well first off, the cunt lost, so thats not important for right now, second, hilaries health WAS messed up, and she was going kinda insane, and collapsing on stage, and third, didn't everyone on the left obsess over donald trumps MENTAL health? Seriously, buncha damn hipocrits.

Anyway, overall, what I got was that brietbart are slightly clickbaitish in making titles, and that they aren't afraid of triggering others : neither of which makes a bad news site.

If you have anything ELSE to add, go ahead, but I still say its not that bad, and I'd rather have serious discussion of brietbart to the snarky BS of cracked anyday.

Also, if those are the 6 "most mind boggling fails" then I'm not at all disappointed in them. The many of the fails would only be fails if you are a leftist, who supports hilary, supports all the LGBT, think you should always believe "victims", ect.

....I see no reason to view them as bad, after reading all that link and viewing the articles they cite themselves : and this whole discussion makes me doubt the discussion on immigrants more, and makes me think people wish to vilify a site so NOBODY checks it out because "its junk", before letting themselves read and judge for themselves. The only part I conceed is they are a bit edgy, and are looking to aggitate people : but frankly even THIS feels like a necessary evil, when everyone is demanding safe spaces , which will inturn make them emotionally weak and feeble.

this is actually why I like crowder for instance : he advocates for fans to read brietbart, salon, huffpost, jezabel, and countless other sights with different opinions : because he doesn't want you taking his word alone.


....But I've never seen this on the left, or from illegal immigrants.

But back to your argument, I'd LOVE to hear which country you are in, even if you didn't include what city or town.

I can't speak for fria tider (especially with the language barrier) but honestly i fail to see how, google translate or not, you could have "rape" and "40 hours community service" both in the same article. I think thats all thats really important. Also, considering it seems they put themselves on the line facing "hate speech" possibly, I'm inclined to think they do it for truth, considering I see no other symptoms of them lying.

Sweden is very different, and they have been damaged beyond repair : I hope in ww3 they get annexed, just to repair them from their broken state. I agree, not all places are as bad, but the fact sweden is packed with immigrants, shames men for "manspreading", but then is (was?) rape capitol of the world shows something is horrendously wrong : to which many think immigrants are the cause, because honestly, what else could it be? Especially since swedish men were kind of turning into pussycats with the extreme feminism, till the rape suddenly started, and no local men defending...

Rape culture was a joke : at least, how feminists mean it : but there is indeed a culture of rape which is going on in Europe, its imported. That was my point : though I wish these women could be armed, I'd love nothing more than European women able to fill rapists full of lead to the point there no body left to mop up, just ground meat.

What exactly is your problem with brietbart? Or are you just one of those morons who teases someone for something they do with 0 evidence or data for WHY its bad?  Because those people I don't take seriously : christian, muslim, LGBT, or whatever, if you shame someone without any data or argument, you are full of shit.